Worship con queso: How sensual delights prepare us for the eternal feast

Musician/author Carolyn Arends will co-lead Theology and Practice of Worship at Canadian Baptist Seminary with Daryl Busby, who is dean of the school. The course, which will take place this weekend (March 13-14) and April 24-25, will address “questions about the theology of worship especially as it applies to the very rich history of Christian worship.”

Following is an article which gives a sense of Arends’ creative approach to worship – and life.

There is a Tex-Mex restaurant in Houston I have visited on three occasions. Each meal has begun with chile con queso. The cheese at this particular restaurant is the most delicious food I have ever tasted.

With every bite, I have been overcome with gratitude to God for creating taste buds, cows and human ingenuity. And that gratitude has led to praise.

 

Some folks understand this. Some think I’m kidding. And others are skeptical that such a carnal thing as a Tex-Mex appetizer could provoke genuine worship.

 

We Christians have a long history of mixed and sometimes openly hostile attitudes toward sensual pleasure. Saint Augustine is the 4th century poster boy for our dilemma, struggling in Book X of his Confessions to rein in each of his five senses. He attempts, for example, to “take food at mealtimes as though it were medicine” and to “fight against the pleasure in order not to be captivated by it.”

 

Augustine is ever-vigilant that pleasure in created things never replace our desire for the Creator. His caution is well taken. But lately I’ve been discovering an emphatically pro-pleasure voice in the writings of another Christian guide.

 

C.S. Lewis is known, of course, as a literary scholar, novelist and apologist. He is also, consistently, a curator of pleasure. Where there is beauty to be received, music to be heard, laughter to be welcomed and (especially) food to be eaten, Lewis attends, celebrates, scrutinizes, describes and partakes.

 

In Letters to Malcolm: Chiefly on Prayer, Lewis argues that the pleasures derived from forest moss and sunlight, bird song, morning air and the comfort of soft slippers are “shafts of [God’s] glory as it strikes our sensibility.” Our task is not to guard against sensual enjoyment, but to allow our minds to run “back up the sunbeam to the sun” – to see every pleasure as a “channel of adoration.”

 

Lewis even argues that there is no such thing as a “bad” pleasure – only pleasures “snatched by unlawful acts.” But he is not blind to the “concupiscence” (lustfulness) that so haunts Augustine. When our response to pleasure is greed instead of adoration – when we seek to grasp and possess rather than receive – our healthy cry of “This also is Thou” distorts into “the fatal word: Encore.”

 

In his introduction to The Four Loves, Lewis distinguishes between “Need-pleasures” and “Pleasures of Appreciation.” The enjoyment we feel upon receiving a Need-pleasure – water to quench thirst, for example, or the scratching of an itch – is intense but short-lived.

 

But with Appreciation-pleasures – nonessential things that awaken us to delight, like delicious smells and tastes and scenes of beauty – the sensation intensifies over time. Greed – the repeated cry of “Encore!” to, say, rich black coffee or extra-creamy queso – may transform a Pleasure of Appreciation into a Pleasure of Need, draining out of it all the lasting enjoyment.

 

The answer, Lewis contends, is not to avoid pleasure but to “have” and “read” it properly: to receive it, open-handed, as both a gift and a message. “We know we are being touched by a finger of that right hand at which there are pleasures for evermore. There need be no question of thanks or praise as a separate event, something done afterwards. To experience the tiny theophany” – the small sign of God’s presence – ”is itself to adore.”

 

In many respects, Augustine and Lewis are arguing two sides of the same coin. But there is a major point of divergence at the heart of their opposite orientations to pleasure. Where Augustine sees our sensuality as a liability to be managed until God “consign[s] both food and belly to destruction,” Lewis views every earthly pleasure as an apprenticeship in adoration for the sort of thing that will go on forever in heaven.

 

Biblical writers seem irresistibly drawn to an image – part metaphor, part promise – of “the sacred meal with God.” From the table prepared for the psalmist (Psalm 23:5), to Jesus’ story of a great banquet (Luke 14:15-24), to the Revelation 19 vision of a wedding supper, the scriptures are filled with the anticipation of feasting together – in the presence of God – forever. The prophet Isaiah (25:6-8) takes particular pleasure in this vision:

 

 

For Lewis, earthly meals are chances to practice the gratitude and adoration that will accompany our everlasting feast with God. Just as trials train us in patience, pleasure trains us in worship. Every sensual enjoyment (properly received) is a “tiny theophany” – a chance to “taste and see” that God is good, and a reminder that there is a whole lot more where that came from.

 

I rest my queso.