Rhetorical excess in the wake of Orlando shooting

gay flag inside 1“Religious intolerance of homosexuality led to mass murder in Orlando.” So ran the headline in the Vancouver Courier last week. Religion columnist Pat Johnson was describing anyone who believes in the traditional (scriptural) understanding of same-sex relationships.

He was talking about Christians, Muslims and Jews – and included the pope, despite his reputation for being compassionate and inclusive:

Shortly after being elected, Pope Francis said of homosexual people, “Who am I to judge?”

This seemed revolutionary. If it is not for the head of the Roman Catholic church to judge, who on earth is to judge? And that seems to have been his point. For those who believe in a higher power, and who contend that God sets out moral rules, then meting out rewards or reprimands really should be the purview of God, not humankind, shouldn’t it?

In a clarification, however, the Pope let it be known that he was mostly saying in different words what well-intentioned people have said all along, that we should “love the sinner but hate the sin.”

This is Johnson’s conclusion:

Religious intolerance of both homosexuality and homosexuals led to mass murder last weekend and to so much pain and violence besides across the centuries. These ideas have no place in our contemporary world, no matter where they are written.

“Love the sinner, hate the sin” is merely a way-station on the bloody road to Orlando.

Other local commentators (and many further afield) have made similar points.
 
On the very day of the massacre, David P. Ball of Vancouver Metro spoke to Trans Alliance chair Morgane Oger:
 
But for Oger, widespread condemnation of the massacre that is emerging from all sides of the political spectrum is not enough to undo the damage of “years of organized hate campaigns by Christian conservatives,” she told Metro. “This guy is just a reflection of that five per cent of society who are bigots and hate others for bigoted reasons, and will actually go act on it.
 
Some within the church reflect a similar outlook:
 
A local tweeter who was following General Synods of the Reformed Church in America and the Christian Reformed Church – and felt that theologically conservative Christians were, sadly, winning the day on votes related to gay issues – urged her followers to prayerfully read Some Thoughts on Orlando. The author of that piece said, among other things:
 
There has been a lot of conversation about how the Church had a hand in the violence that took place [in Orlando] Sunday. I agree with that. When you sow seeds of homophobia and racism, hatred and violence, do not be surprised by the poisoned fruit you reap.
 
The fact is that the Orlando killer admired ISIS and apparently hated gays (and himself?). His acts were deplorable. Muslim organizations said so, the Catholic church said so, the Evangelical Fellowship of Canada said so. Anyone in their right mind said so. And believed it.

Omar Mateen cannot legitimately be said to have drawn on mainstream Muslim teachings, let alone on Christian teachings or practices. 

Listen to what the pope said:

A person once asked me, in a provocative manner, if I approved of homosexuality. I replied with another question: ‘Tell me: when God looks at a gay person, does he endorse the existence of this person with love, or reject and condemn this person?’ We must always consider the person. Here we enter into the mystery of the human being.
 
Or to Sam Allberry, an Anglican  minister visiting from England, who recently gave five lectures at Westside Church on the topic Is God Anti-gay? He argued that in a democratic society it is our job to commend our views to one another. There is no reason why we should be excluded from the public square, he said, stressing that the gospel is for everyone:
 
Repent and believe in the good news. . . there’s no one who is straight; we are all skewed in our sexuality.

Or to what Jesus said to the woman caught in adultery:

Let him who is without sin cast the first stone. . . . Has no one condemned you? [No one, Lord.]  Neither do I condemn you; go and sin no more. John 8:7,11

(I would like to add that Pat Johnson has written many good articles on religion in the Vancouver Courier. Within the last month or two, for example, his profiles on Gisela Kreglinger (‘Wine and spirituality go hand-in-hand’), Ray Aldred (‘Indigenous people see land as inseparable from spirituality’) and Yonghua Ge (‘Where science meets theology and duality’) have all been very worthwhile.)

Who would Jesus blame?
 
Matt Tebbe and Ben Sternke wrote a balanced response to the issue in The Orlando Shooting: Who would Jesus blame?:

What has stood out to us in the aftermath of the Orlando shooting is how quickly we move from tragedy to blame, how easy it is to make enemies, to pounce on the guilty, to leverage suffering for our own agendas, and to do it all as a means to secure our own self-justification.

This particular event offers us a seemingly endless smorgasbord of scapegoat games:

  • Muslims vs Christians
  • Progressive vs conservative
  • Gay rights vs religious liberty
  • America vs ISIS
  • Trump vs Hillary
  • Gun owners vs Obama

If we think there is a right side to these binary, zero-sum game antagonisms, the cross of Jesus Christ still has work to do in our life, because we are still caught up in the scapegoating polarity of the satanic system of the world.

The good news is that we are free in Christ, not to pick the “correct” scapegoat, but to refuse to scapegoat anyone!

They (Tebbe and Sternke) go on to suggest that we should (1) repent (“Instead of looking for the “right” person to blame, we pause to reflectively ask what ‘us vs them’ antagonism am I caught up in?”); (2) lament (“The Psalms are full of good lamenting. Start there if you need some words to get you going.”) and (3) connect (Jesus “moved toward the people most likely to be scapegoated in his culture!”).

The church still has a long way to go in loving and welcoming, but we won’t get there by giving up the  biblical standard for marriage. As Sam Allberry put it, “We don’t have a doctrine of homosexuality, we have a doctrine of marriage.”

9 comments for “Rhetorical excess in the wake of Orlando shooting

  1. Dan Williams
    June 23, 2016 at 8:44 am

    Your article was a clear, concise and (in the present climate) courageous commentary

  2. Neil Bramble
    June 23, 2016 at 9:50 am

    Well done, Flyn.

    It is almost impossible for the church collectively or Christians individually to become involved in intelligent discussion on these issues because of the virulently strong and largely uninformed negative — and intolerant — stance taken by those who oppose God, Christians and all other religions. I find that these reactions reveal some of the greatest intolerance in our society.

  3. Robert Doll
    June 23, 2016 at 10:25 am

    Overall a good one, Flyn, though I have difficulty subscribing to your final “conclusion” on marriage.

    “New occasions teach new duties, time makes ancient good uncouth.
    They must upward still and onward, who would keep abreast of truth.”

    • Jan Constantinescu
      June 23, 2016 at 1:35 pm

      Well said, as always Bob. I have a close, gay Christian friend for whom Orlando was very traumatic. In his experience, it took nearly a week for him to have the courage to walk down the street and not be afraid.

  4. Sandeep
    June 23, 2016 at 2:19 pm

    Thanks Flyn,
    I do hope that more people will find such gentle courage to speak the truth in love. You have managed to do so well.

  5. Joe Pal
    June 24, 2016 at 1:04 am

    I ask Christians why is there no lowering the flag for the 34 million or more murdered babies in the womb in USA and over one million Canadians with the same outcome?

    Orlando was horrible. Line that up with these millions of babies slaughtered in the womb. Are you going to call me a bigot? I think there is a lot of head in the sand of what 34 million babies look like all in a row. It makes me wonder about the state of of how Christians are thinking.

  6. Janet Porcino
    June 24, 2016 at 6:15 pm

    Thanks, Flyn for this helpful article. Your readers may appreciate the sensitive prayer the Inter-Varsity group at Johns Hopkins posted June 15:

    God of healing, we come to you with grieving hearts. We mourn the unjust deaths of 49 people, each one a beloved child, sibling and friend, who were murdered in Orlando on Sunday morning. We grieve with the families and communities of the victims of this evil and trust that you will bring them comfort, peace, and healing.
    We intercede for members of the LGBTQ+ and Latinx communities who have experienced acts of hatred, who are hurting and walking in fear. Heavenly Father, we rebuke the strongholds that threaten our brothers and sisters, and we pray that you would tear them down with your mighty power. We pray that you would comfort them, fill them with the peace that surpasses all understanding, heal all wounds and give them strength to overcome all fear.
    We confess our silence and our complacency in response to the marginalization, denigration and dehumanization of our LGBTQ+ neighbors. We acknowledge the pain that the Christian community has caused not only in the face of this tragic event, but in many moments in the past. Teach us to love and protect our neighbors as you would have us do.
    Lord, we hope in the power of restoration that comes through your son, Jesus Christ, and in your perfect love, justice, and mercy. Would you be at work today, and everyday, in the midst of the brokenness of this world. In the name of Jesus we pray, Amen.

    • Bob Doll
      June 24, 2016 at 11:02 pm

      Thank you, Jan. Loving and powerful prayer. Good to see you on Flyn’s website!

    • Jan Constantinescu
      June 27, 2016 at 10:52 pm

      INTERVARSITY piece is very compassionate, great to meet up on Flyn’s site.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *